Grantmakers are updating traditional methods with data-driven strategies and human-centered design. These 7 emerging trends are reshaping how foundations support impactful organizations. They provide practical solutions to expand applicant pools, reduce bias, ensure authenticity, and measure impact. Each trend draws on years of experience and incorporates key insights from Reviewrs grantmaking experts. Successful grant programs integrate these innovations, enhancing transparency, equity, and effectiveness throughout the grantmaking process.
Click here for an Interactive tour of trend #1
Traditional application processes often miss qualified organizations who either don't know about your grant opportunity or don't believe they're competitive. Forward-thinking programs are addressing this through nomination workflows:
The Two-Tier Approach:
Key Benefits:
Implementation Tip: Keep the nomination form extremely simple (under 5 minutes to complete) to encourage participation. Include only organization name, contact information, and a brief reason for nomination.
Click here for an interactive tour of trend 2
Traditional reference letters have long been problematic - they're inconsistent, burdensome to write, difficult to compare, and often contain bias-triggering information. Leading programs are replacing them with structured templates:
Why Traditional Reference Letters Fall Short:
The Template Solution:
Real-World Results: When one foundation switched from letters to templates, reference completion rates increased from 71% to 96%, and reviewer feedback indicated significantly more useful, comparable information for decision-making.
Click here for an interactive tour of trend 3
As AI writing tools become increasingly sophisticated, leading grant programs are implementing systems to identify AI-generated or plagiarized content:
Detection Capabilities:
Strategic Implementation:
Best Practice: Rather than simply rejecting applications with AI indicators, use detection as an opportunity to clarify expectations around original work and provide guidance on appropriate use of technology.
Click here for an interactive tour of trend 4
Unconscious bias remains one of the greatest challenges in grant selection. Innovative programs are implementing comprehensive frameworks to minimize its impact:
Key Components:
Implementation Insight: Start by surveying your review team to determine their realistic capacity, then design a workflow that delivers quality reviews without overwhelming evaluators. For example, if your review team can comfortably evaluate 15 applications each and you want every application reviewed by 5 different people, your system should automatically generate these balanced assignments.
Click here for an interactive tour of trend 5
Even with structured scoring rubrics, individual reviewers often have different baseline standards - some consistently score high while others are more stringent. Advanced programs now normalize these variations:
The Problem Illustrated: One foundation discovered that a reviewer (let's call him "Bob") never scored applicants higher than 15 on their 25-point scale. Bob was shocked when an organization he rated 14 (his highest score) wasn't selected. Analysis revealed other reviewers routinely awarded scores in the 20-25 range, making Bob's "high" scores appear low in comparison.
Normalization Solutions:
Implementation Tip: Create a "reviewer profile" for each evaluator showing their average scores and distribution patterns. Use this to contextualize their evaluations within the broader reviewer pool.
Click here to view interactive tour of trend 6
As we explored in our previous email, leading grant programs are implementing sophisticated approaches to measuring and reporting impact:
Long-Term Tracking Framework:
Structured Reporting Templates:
Pro Tip: Design your impact tracking to dovetail with natural touchpoints in the grantee journey. When data collection aligns with moments that already matter to organizations (board meetings, fiscal year close, strategic planning), compliance rates significantly increase.
The most innovative grant programs recognize that transparency and security are not just compliance requirements but strategic advantages:
Transparency Components:
Security Standards:
Implementation Insight: Create a public-facing "Proof of Process" document that outlines your entire grant lifecycle, from application to selection to post-award management. This transparency builds trust and demonstrates your commitment to fairness.
While each of these trends represents an important innovation, their true power comes when implemented as part of a comprehensive grant management system. The most successful programs recognize that these elements work together:
Together, these innovations create a virtuous cycle where increased trust leads to better applicants, more engaged reviewers, and stronger stakeholder support - ultimately producing greater impact.
Implementing all seven trends simultaneously isn't necessary or realistic for most programs. Instead, consider this phased approach:
Phase 1 (Immediate)
Phase 2 (Near-Term)
Phase 3 (Longer-Term)
Remember: The goal isn't perfection but continuous improvement. Each step forward creates more value for your grantees, more efficiency for your team, and more impact for your mission.
The all-in-one platform for managing scholarships, grants and awards programs.
