.png)
Eliminate bias with redacted review & randomization
Normalize scores across strict and lenient reviewers
Structure committee deliberation and consensus
Automate shortlisting with defensible criteria
Document every decision from review to award
Each reviewer gets a dedicated portal with their assigned submissions, deadlines, and progress — keeping the experience focused, efficient, and respectful of their time. A better reviewer experience means higher quality reviews and better volunteer retention.

Assign submissions to reviewers with the level of control your program requires — from precise one-to-one pairing to fully randomized distribution across panels.

Build fairness into every step of the evaluation process — from how reviewers are assigned to what information they can see.

Choose the evaluation method that fits your program — quantitative scoring with weighted rubrics, comparative ranking, or simple recommendation-based decisions.

View applicant details including forms, files, and notes side by side with structured scoring rubrics — keeping all context in one place during evaluation.

Automatically detect and adjust for strict or lenient scoring patterns across reviewers — leveling the playing field so every submission is evaluated fairly regardless of which reviewer it was assigned to.

Move from scores to selections with structured deliberation tools, automated shortlisting, and documented final decision workflows.

Assign specific submissions to specific reviewers when you need precise control over who evaluates what.
Organize reviewers into committees or panels to structure evaluation across teams, divisions, or review stages.
Randomize the order submissions appear for each reviewer, eliminating order bias and ensuring fairer evaluations.
Automatically calculate averages, weighted totals, and aggregate scores across reviewers — no manual spreadsheet work needed.
Allow reviewers to rank submissions against each other rather than scoring individually — ideal for competitive selection programs.
Record final selection decisions with approval workflows, ensuring every award has a documented, defensible path from review to outcome.