An applicant emails asking whether their LOI was received and if they're eligible to submit a full proposal. You check three different tools to piece together an answer.
AI-enhanced full lifecycle platform for grant management — built to streamline operations, power smarter reviews, and drive confident funding decisions.
.png)
You're spending more time managing the process than making community impact. Reviewr replaces the patchwork of form tools, email, shared drives, and disconnected systems with one platform for your entire grant lifecycle.
A grant application shouldn't be a barrier to impact. Reviewr gives applicants a modern, guided experience with a living profile that follows them from proposal through post-award reporting.
.png)
Volunteer reviewers shouldn't need a training manual to evaluate proposals fairly. Reviewr gives your panel everything in one place so evaluations are consistent, equitable, and defensible.
.png)
Before proposals open, the success of your entire grant cycle is already being determined. Eligibility criteria in scattered documents. Reviewer assignments in spreadsheets. The application built in a tool that has no idea what happens after someone hits submit. Nothing connected — and you don't discover the gaps until you're mid-cycle.
Most grant platforms let everyone submit a full proposal and sort out eligibility later — after wasting applicant time and leaving reviewers buried in ineligible submissions. Reviewr screens at the front door with LOI pre-qualification and automatic eligibility matching.
.png)
In most grant systems, applicants are rows in a spreadsheet. They submit a form, hope it went through, and wait. Your team pieces together their information across email, file folders, and form exports. Reviewr gives every applicant a living profile — a single record that captures their proposal, documents, communications, and ongoing deliverables.
Proposals are flowing in. Deadlines are approaching. Review panels need coordinating. This is where most teams lose control — toggling between spreadsheets, email, and form tools trying to figure out who's submitted, who hasn't, and what needs attention. Reviewr gives you one operational view of your entire grant program.
Every dollar awarded traces back to this stage. Inconsistent scoring, undetected bias, and undocumented decisions don't just produce unfair outcomes — they put your program's reputation at risk when funders, boards, or applicants ask how selections were made. Reviewr gives your panel the structure to evaluate fairly and the documentation to answer with confidence.
Reviews are complete and scores are in. For most teams this is where things stall — committees passing spreadsheets, award letters drafted one at a time, applicants waiting weeks to hear back. Reviewr moves you from scores to decisions to notifications in one connected workflow.
.avif)
For most platforms — and most teams — the process ends when awards are announced. But for grant managers, the real work is just starting. Grant agreements, compliance documents, financial reports, milestone tracking — all collected manually, tracked in spreadsheets, and chased over email. Reviewr keeps the process going with the same structure and automation your program had before the award.
Awards go out. Then what? Multi-year grants need tracking. Renewal eligibility needs verifying. Funders and boards want to know what their investment produced. Most teams cobble together answers from spreadsheets and manual outreach — if they track post-award outcomes at all. Reviewr keeps the data flowing after the award.
.avif)
Transform lengthy, multi-part grant proposals into concise reviewer briefs — pulling mission alignment, budget highlights, and narrative key points into a single overview so reviewers evaluate faster and more consistently.
Automatically detect strict and lenient scoring patterns across your review panel and normalize results — ensuring every proposal is evaluated on a level playing field regardless of which reviewer it was assigned to.
Use AI to verify eligibility criteria automatically against applicant responses — reducing ineligible submissions and ensuring only qualified organizations advance to full proposal review.
Identify AI-generated content and flag plagiarized material across narratives and written responses — protecting program integrity and ensuring authentic proposals from every applicant.
Automatically redact identifying information from proposals and uploaded documents to enable blind review — without manual effort from staff.
Extract data from uploaded documents like financial statements, tax forms, and IRS determination letters — enabling cross-validation against submitted responses to catch discrepancies and improve data accuracy.
Form tools collect submissions — that's where they stop. Reviewr manages your entire grant lifecycle: LOI screening, eligibility, proposal collection, blind review, panel scoring, committee decisions, award notifications, post-award compliance, renewals, and impact reporting. Everything connected in one platform instead of spread across disconnected tools.
Reviewr manages the full grant lifecycle — from LOI through post-award compliance, multi-year grants, and impact reporting — where most platforms stop at the funding decision. At the core is an industry-leading review and selection engine with blind review, standardized rubrics, score normalization, and AI-powered capabilities like proposal summaries and smart eligibility matching. The result is a platform built for how grant programs actually operate — not just how they collect proposals.
Yes. Each program gets its own eligibility rules, application forms, review criteria, timelines, and communication templates — all managed from a single dashboard. Whether you run one grant program or dozens, every program is visible in one place.
Blind review strips identifying information from proposals. Standardized rubrics with weighted criteria ensure every reviewer evaluates against the same framework. Score normalization adjusts for strict and lenient tendencies across your panel. Every score, vote, and decision is documented with a full audit trail.
Impact reporting, outcome tracking, and exportable reports in PDF and CSV. Track proposal volume, award breakdowns, demographic data, and post-award outcomes like milestone completion and financial reports — so you can demonstrate program ROI to any audience.
Grantees update their profile each cycle with current progress reports, financial updates, and required documentation. You manage new applicants and returning grantees in the same program — no separate workflows. Updated data drives renewal decisions and feeds directly into impact reporting.
Yes. Reviewr supports importing existing submissions so you don't have to start from scratch. The onboarding team works with you to migrate your data and ensure a smooth transition from your current process.
Yes. Reviewr is SOC 2 Type II certified with encryption in transit and at rest, role-based access controls, field-level data visibility, and full audit logs — meeting requirements for handling sensitive organizational and financial data.
Most grant programs are live within days. Reviewr is a modern SaaS platform — you can self-launch using built-in guides and a comprehensive knowledge base, or work directly with a grants expert for guided implementation and hands-on training.
Powering Secure, Scalable, and Fair Scholarship Management with Reviewr
Powering the High School Coding Competition with Reviewr
Powering Research Grant Management with Reviewr
The all-in-one platform for managing scholarships, grants and awards programs.
