An applicant emails asking if their application was received and whether their references have submitted yet. You check three different tools to piece together an answer.
AI-enhanced full lifecycle platform for fellowship programs — built to attract exceptional candidates, coordinate selection, and support fellows from placement through program completion.
You're spending more time managing documents and chasing submissions than actually building a program worth applying to. Reviewr replaces the patchwork of application tools, email threads, shared drives, and scoring spreadsheets with one connected platform for your entire fellowship lifecycle.
The application experience reflects the quality of the fellowship itself. Reviewr gives candidates a polished, professional experience from first click to final submission — and gives your program the presence that attracts the talent you're looking for.
Fellowship selection decisions carry weight — for the fellows chosen, the ones who aren't, and the funders and institutions watching. Inconsistent scoring and undocumented decisions put your program's credibility at risk. Reviewr gives your review panel the structure to evaluate rigorously and the documentation to stand behind every decision.
AI-generated summaries of research proposals, project narratives, and writing samples to accelerate reviewer preparation
Automatic detection of scoring anomalies, inconsistent evaluations, and potential reviewer bias patterns
AI-powered originality checks across proposals, writing samples, and submitted materials
Automatic extraction and validation of data from CVs, transcripts, publications, and supporting documents
AI-assisted identification of potential reviewer conflicts based on institutional affiliations and co-authorship patterns
Historical cohort analysis to identify patterns that predict program completion and long-term fellow impact
Before applications open, the success of your entire fellowship cycle is already being determined. Eligibility criteria in scattered documents. Review panel assignments in someone's inbox. The application built in a tool that has no idea what happens after someone submits. Nothing connected — and you don't discover the gaps until you're already mid-cycle.
Most fellowship programs let anyone apply and sort out eligibility later — after wasting applicant time and burying reviewers in applications that don't qualify. Reviewr screens at the front door and ensures only eligible candidates enter the pipeline.
In most fellowship programs, applicants are rows in a spreadsheet. They submit a form, hope it went through, and wait. Your team pieces together their information across email, file folders, and form exports. Reviewr gives every applicant a living profile — a single record that captures their application, documents, communications, and status — in one centralized hub.
Fellowship applications depend heavily on references — academic advisors, supervisors, and professional mentors who can speak to a candidate's readiness and potential. Chasing those references is one of the most time-consuming parts of running a fellowship. Reviewr puts reference collection in the hands of the applicant and automates everything else.
.png)
Applications are flowing in. Deadlines are approaching. Review panels need coordinating. This is where most teams lose control — toggling between spreadsheets, email, and form tools trying to figure out who's submitted, who hasn't, and what needs attention. Reviewr gives you one operational view of your entire program with the tools to act on it.
Every fellowship awarded traces back to this stage. Inconsistent scoring, undetected bias, and undocumented decisions don't just produce unfair outcomes — they put your program's reputation at risk when applicants, funders, or institutional partners ask how selections were made. Reviewr gives your panel the structure to evaluate rigorously and the documentation to answer with confidence.
Reviews are complete and scores are in. For most teams this is where things stall — panels passing spreadsheets, acceptance letters drafted one at a time, applicants waiting weeks to hear back. Reviewr moves you from scores to decisions to notifications in one connected workflow.
Selection isn't the end. Fellows have ongoing obligations — progress reports, project milestones, deliverables, and program check-ins that need to happen on schedule throughout the fellowship. Most programs manage this entirely over email with no tracking and no automation. Reviewr uses supplemental forms to keep collecting structured data at every stage, all flowing back into the same fellow profile.
The fellowship ends. Now funders, boards, and institutional partners want to know what the program produced. Most teams cobble together answers from disconnected emails, spreadsheets, and alumni surveys — if they tracked outcomes at all. Reviewr keeps the data flowing after completion so you can verify program requirements were met and prove the value of every dollar invested.
The all-in-one platform for managing scholarships, grants and awards programs.
