Reviewr vs. Survey Monkey Apply (SM Apply)

For SurveyMonkey, application management is a bolt-on. For Reviewr, it's everything.

SurveyMonkey built its name on surveys and forms, and Apply reflects that DNA: a form-first tool with application review layered on top. It collects and routes submissions fine, but evaluation — scoring, blind review, real judging — feels bolted on rather than built in. Reviewr was designed for review from the start: everything you need to run scholarship, grant, and award programs, with the evaluation depth built in.

60%
Less staff time reported by customers.
4.9/5
Customer support score
1
Platform for the full program lifecycle
Why Teams Switch

Where the gaps show up in practice

Acquired Bolt-On

SurveyMonkey Apply started as FluidReview, an application tool acquired by a survey company in 2014 and folded into its suite — now under private-equity ownership. The founding team has moved on, and application management sits as one product among many.

The Reviewr Difference

Reviewr has built for one discipline since 2011 — running world class scholarship, grant, and award programs. There's no survey business to serve and no suite to subsidize. 100% of product investment goes toward your programs.

Self-Service vs. Built-For-You

Setting up SM Apply means a Customer Engagement Rep builds your forms, workflows, and automations for you. Iterating later means going back through their team, or relearning a back end that administrators consistently describe as having a steep learning curve.

The Reviewr Difference

Reviewr is self-service by design. Build and adjust your own forms, workflows, and reviewer assignments without waiting in a vendor queue — and without needing a developer to make a change mid-cycle. Need help? Don't worry, we're here every step of the way.

Review Experience

SM Apply's reviewer split screen renders the application as a PDF, blind review works only at the whole-form level, and scoring is standard — with applicant and reviewer data that reviewers say is hard to merge. No AI review tooling.

The Reviewr Difference

A native side-by-side reviewer view with materials and scoring together, field-level redaction for true blind review, configurable assignment, and normalized scoring that surfaces reviewer bias.

Pricing & Packaging

Submittable doesn't publish pricing. Third-party sources report steep jumps between tiers, extra fees for added users and features, and at least one reviewer describing a capability mentioned in the sales call that required an additional, prohibitively expensive add-on.

The Reviewr Difference

Straightforward pricing that directly relates to the value you will receive with measurable ROI. Every standard report included. No surprise add-ons when you need a combined data export.

Feature By Feature

Where it matters, Reviewr wins.

An objective look at what each platform delivers for scholarship, grant, and award programs — including where SM Apply genuinely excels.
FEATURE

Reviewr

SM Apply

Centralized opportunity hub
Reviewr Wins
task_alt
clear
Expression-based eligibility
Reviewr Wins
task_alt
Partial
Self-service configuration
Reviewr Wins
task_alt
clear
Conditional form logic
task_alt
task_alt
Applicant save & resume
task_alt
task_alt
Organization-branded communications
Reviewr Wins
task_alt
Partial
FEATURE

Reviewr

SM Apply

Native side-by-side reviewer view
Reviewr Wins
task_alt
Partial
Field-level redaction for blind review
Reviewr Wins
task_alt
Partial
Normalized scoring that surfaces bias
Reviewr Wins
task_alt
clear
Configurable assignment models
Reviewr Wins
task_alt
Partial
AI-assisted review tools
Reviewr Wins
task_alt
clear
Reviewer progress dashboard
Reviewr Wins
task_alt
Partial
FEATURE

Reviewr

SM Apply

Full lifecycle in one platform
Reviewr Wins
task_alt
Partial
Award & fund tracking
task_alt
task_alt
Reference & recommendation management
Reviewr Wins
task_alt
Partial
Recipient communication & engagement
task_alt
task_alt
Renewals & multi-year programs
task_alt
task_alt
FEATURE

Reviewr

SM Apply

Standard reports & exports included
Reviewr Wins
task_alt
Partial
Cross-program dashboards
Reviewr Wins
task_alt
task_alt
Custom report builder
task_alt
task_alt
FEATURE

Reviewr

SM Apply

Transparent, published-tier pricing
task_alt
Partial
Configurability & automations included
Reviewr Wins
task_alt
Partial
SOC 2 Type II certified
task_alt
task_alt
Support through peak deadline windows
clear
task_alt
Self-service changes, no vendor queue
Reviewr Wins
task_alt
clear
Being Honest

Where SM Apply genuinely wins

We'd rather give you an accurate picture than oversell. If these capabilities are your primary need, SM Apply may be the right fit.
check
Applicant ease of use
check
SurveyMonkey ecosystem
check
Customer service
check
Backed by a lage organization
The honest qualifier: SM Apply is a capable, well-supported application tool — especially if you're already invested in the SurveyMonkey ecosystem or run relatively straightforward programs.

Choose SM Apply if you're primarily looking for a data-collection tool — a reliable way to collect and route submissions.

Choose Reviewr if you need end-to-end lifecycle management — one platform that carries a program from submission through evaluation to final decision.
The Defining Difference

Control that shows up when it counts most.

With SM Apply, your site is built by a Customer Engagement Rep during onboarding — and changing a form, workflow, or assignment rule later means going back through their team or relearning a back end administrators describe as having a steep learning curve. When your cycle is live and something needs to change, that lag is exactly when it hurts.

To be fair, SM Apply's support is genuinely well-regarded — responsive, knowledgeable, and their highest-rated dimension. But responsive support and a self-service platform aren't the same thing. Reviewr is built so your team configures and evolves programs directly — no queue, no dependency.

Talk to a Real Person Today
Reviewr
check
You build and edit forms, workflows, and assignments yourself with expert assistance if needed/desired.
check
Dedicated support during application deadlines
check
Change anything mid-cycle without a vendor queue
check
4.9 / 5 customer service rating — highest-rated dimension
sm apply
remove
Site built for you by a Customer Engagement Rep
clear
Workflow changes typically routed through their team
clear
Configurable workflows & automations gated to the top tier
The Numbers

Real outcomes from real programs

These come from program managers running scholarship and grant cycles on Reviewr today.
60%
Reduction in staff time for program management
4.9/5
Customer support score — the single highest-rated dimension

Ready to run a better program this cycle?

See Reviewr live in 30 minutes. We'll walk through your specific program type, answer every question, and connect you with a reference customer before you decide.


No sales pressure. No commitment required.