Connect every grant to community need with smart forms, weighted scoring, post-award follow-up, and impact reports.
In a 2024 study of 485 community health strategies from 83 nonprofit hospitals, 71% were evaluated on system utilization, like visits and participants, while only 34% were evaluated on social outcomes (Health Care Management Review, July 2024). The researchers called it a missed opportunity to show impact and to guide where limited resources go.
Hospital foundations feel that gap directly. Funding requests, reviewer scores, and outcome reports often live in separate places. When a board member asks which community needs this year's grants addressed, and what changed because of them, the answer takes weeks to assemble.
Without that connection, it's harder to defend funding priorities, harder to show donors and community partners their dollars mattered, and harder to decide what to fund next.
This session draws on Review Integrity, a framework for judging whether any funding, award, or application review process is fair, clear, and defensible. We'll focus on three parts of it:
Under IRS Section 501(r)(3), nonprofit hospitals complete a community health needs assessment every three years, and each one must evaluate the impact of actions taken since the last. Foundations that collect the right data from the first application onward are ready when that question comes.
Hospital and health system foundation presidents and executive directors, grants managers, community benefit and community health staff, and anyone who reports foundation impact to a board.
Can't attend live? Register anyway and we'll send you the recording.