Case Study

Case Study: American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM)

Case Study: American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM)

Powering Research Grant Management with Reviewr

Overview

The American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM) supports the advancement of osteopathic medical education and research across the United States. As part of its mission to drive innovation and evidence-based progress in healthcare, AACOM funds a Research Grants Program that supports academic researchers, educators, and clinicians conducting impactful studies in osteopathic medicine.

To streamline the administration of this competitive and multi-faceted grants program, AACOM partnered with Reviewr to manage the full lifecycle of grant operations — from proposal submission and collaborative development through review, award, and ongoing reporting.

The Challenge

AACOM’s Research Grants Program sought to foster high-quality research while ensuring operational efficiency, fairness, and transparency across the application and review process. However, managing a high volume of submissions with varying research categories, collaborators, and ongoing reporting requirements created key challenges:

  • Complex submission structure: Grant proposals often included multiple collaborators contributing to project narratives, budgets, and supporting documentation.

  • Diverse focus areas: Applications spanned multiple research focus categories, each requiring its own specialized review process, criteria, and scoring rubrics.

  • Administrative burden: Manual coordination of submissions, reviews, and communication between applicants and committees was time-consuming and prone to version control errors.

  • Ongoing reporting: Selected grantees needed to submit recurring progress updates and impact metrics, requiring a system to manage post-award deliverables efficiently.

  • Fairness and compliance: AACOM needed a consistent, compliant process to ensure equitable review and eliminate potential bias among committees.

Without a unified system, the process relied heavily on emails, spreadsheets, and shared drives — limiting visibility, scalability, and efficiency.

The Solution: Reviewr Grant Management Platform

AACOM implemented Reviewr’s grant management software to modernize and automate every phase of the research grant process.

1. Centralized Application and Collaboration Portal
Researchers now submit their proposals directly through a secure, centralized portal. Reviewr’s Collaborator Function allows applicants to invite co-investigators, research assistants, or administrators to join the same application workspace. Each team member can contribute to sections of the proposal, upload documents, and collaborate in real time, ensuring accuracy and completeness prior to submission.

Applicants provide:

  • Project summaries and research abstracts

  • Detailed budgets and funding requests

  • Methodology and impact narratives

  • Letters of support or institutional endorsements

2. Research Focus Area Routing and Categorization
Upon submission, Reviewr automatically routes each application to the appropriate research focus area based on selected topics and project details. Each focus area functions as its own “review stream,” with a unique committee, tailored scoring rubric, and evaluation criteria.

This automated categorization eliminates manual sorting, ensures proposals reach the correct reviewers, and maintains consistency and fairness across categories.

3. Tailored Review and Evaluation Workflows
Within each focus area, Reviewr facilitates:

  • Custom scoring rubrics aligned to that area’s goals and evaluation standards

  • Randomized reviewer assignments to balance workload and prevent bias

  • A split-screen review interface for side-by-side access to proposals and scoring tools

  • Collaborative commenting tools allowing reviewers to discuss and calibrate scores in real time

Administrators maintain full visibility through Reviewr’s progress dashboards, ensuring committees stay on schedule and aligned.

4. Award Management and Post-Grant Reporting
After award selection, Reviewr supports AACOM’s post-grant management through its multi-phase program tools. Selected grantees log into Reviewr to submit:

  • Periodic progress reports

  • Updated budget or expenditure tracking

  • Quantitative research outcomes and metrics

These deliverables feed directly into AACOM’s reporting dashboards, giving administrators and stakeholders clear insight into program performance and grant impact.

5. Compliance, Transparency, and Reporting
Reviewr provides full audit trails, access logs, and data security features to ensure compliance with research and funding regulations. Administrators can generate real-time reports summarizing applicant demographics, review outcomes, funding distributions, and long-term research results for board and public reporting.

Results

Key Outcomes

  • Enabled researchers and collaborators to work seamlessly on shared applications

  • Automated routing and categorization reduced administrative workload by over 60%

  • Ensured equitable review processes across multiple committees and disciplines

  • Improved quality and consistency of scoring and evaluation

  • Provided continuous oversight and impact measurement through post-award deliverables

The Impact

Through Reviewr, the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine has established a modern, secure, and transparent research grant management process that aligns with its mission to advance osteopathic medical education and research excellence.

The platform’s automation and collaboration tools empower researchers to focus on content quality rather than logistics, while review committees operate with improved structure, fairness, and accountability.

Post-award reporting capabilities ensure AACOM can measure outcomes, demonstrate ROI, and continually improve its research funding strategy — creating lasting impact across the osteopathic medical education community.