Reviewr is the end-to-end platform for everything after submit — scholarships, grants, awards and sponsorship requests, from application to decision to outcome. Judging done the right way, impact you can measure, and every decision defensible to your board, your donors and your applicants.
Knockout questions and eligibility matching so the committee only sees eligible, complete submissions. Applications tiered to the size of the award. Save-and-return and automatic reminders so more of the right applicants finish. References requested, chased and tracked on the applicant’s behalf.
Weighted rubrics built once and shown split-screen beside the entry — application on one side, scorecard on the other — with the same criteria and weights the applicant saw before the deadline.
Blind review with identifying fields hidden. Random distribution to a set number of reviewers, with caps, so nobody reads everything. Enforced conflict-of-interest declarations. A scorer-tendency report that shows which judges score hard or easy, so outcomes reflect merit, not which reviewer you drew.
Every score, comment and status change in one record with a full audit trail, on a SOC 2 Type II platform where you own and can export all of your data. When a board member, a donor or an applicant asks how a decision was made, the answer is minutes away — from one place, without calling anyone who was in the room.
Criteria-linked feedback to every applicant, not only the ones who ask. Then the post-selection work — acceptance, proof of enrollment, grantee reports, thank-yous — in the same record as the application, with reporting by program, category and cycle, so you can show your board and your donors what the program actually achieved.
Scholarships, awards, grants, fellowships, competitions and donation requests under one roof — unlimited programs, users, reviewers and applicants, so the cost doesn’t move as the program grows.